DailyClout
  • BillCam
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Our Team
    • Press
  • BillCam
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Our Team
    • Press

We Explain the Warring “Child Detention” Bills: Which Party Better Protects Kids at the Border?

June 21, 2018 • by Fran Sheff-Mauer

As headlines have been blaring, we see daily scenes confirming that dozens of parents who have arrived without documentation over the Mexico/US border, are being separated from their children every day. The children are being identified as “unaccompanied minors” and are being sent into government custody, or else into foster care. The parents are being identified as criminals and are being held in ICE detention.

Between October 1, 2017, and May 31, 2018, according to the website Snopes.com, at least 2,700 children have been separated from their parents. One thousand, nine hundred and ninety-five of them were separated over in just under six weeks — from April 18 to May 31 2018— which indicates that at present, an average of 45 children are being taken from their parents each day. There is a Federal detention center for children in Berks County, PA, and four centers either in operation, or planned, for Texas.

On June 14, 2018, House Republicans released a draft bill, the Border Security and Immigration Reform Act of 2018, that would, in their summary, “create an avenue for Dreamers to obtain green cards, increase border security funding, eliminate the Diversity Visa lottery program, and reform family immigration and asylum laws.”

Click here to view and download the Republican House Bill: the Border Security and Immigration Reform Act.

The bill comes to the floor on June 24. It would bring dozens of judges to the border to try cases more quickly, and children would be detained along with their parents.

In reaction, and in response to news stories about separated families, and following a domestic and international outcry, Democrats, led by Rep. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) have proposed S. 3036, known as the “Keeping Families Together Act” You can see it here and you can share it on social media, using DailyClout’s BillCam.

In the words of the summary of the sponsors, this bill is “in favor of family and sibling unity and parental rights,” and it states that “detention is not in the best interests of families and children.”. It would ban the separation of families.

As of June 19, 2014, all Democrats have signed onto this bill, and some on social media are urging their Republican colleagues to join them.

Meanwhile, human rights advocates have used another avenue, a judicial ruling, to challenge the detention of children at the border. This is the “Flores Settlement of 1997.” Click here to read more about it.

This 2015 ruling, by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, held that the Federal government had violated a settlement agreement by detaining children in family immigration detention centers, along with their parents.

The Flores Settlement Agreement (Flores) imposed several obligations on the immigration authorities, which fall into three broad categories:

  1. The government is required to release children from immigration detention without unnecessary delay to, in order of preference, parents, other adult relatives, or licensed programs willing to accept custody.
  2. If a suitable placement is not immediately available, the government is obligated to place children in the “least restrictive” setting appropriate to their age and any special needs.
  3. The government must implement standards relating to the care and treatment of children in immigration detention

The Federal government is appealing that decision in the Ninth Circuit.

Today, President Trump signed an Executive Order that suspended the separation of families. However, a reading of the text shows that there are loopholes; the uniting of families depends on whether there are “resources” enough to do so. It also, critics claim, will do little to solve the problem, and the administration declared today that it is not responsible for locating the 2000 plus children that were separated from their families prior to this Executive Order. The burden, stated a spokesman, is on the families to find their kids.

Look at the BillCam of the Democrats’ bill and the draft of the Republican bill; and share both through social media. You can use BillCam to tweet your Rep. and even ask him or her on Twitter to add to or change aspects of the bill in the BillCam. Have your say! You may agree that separating families is wise; or you may feel that it must stop immediately.

Leave a comment!

Previous StoryWATCH: DailyClout explains Warring “Child Detention Center” Bills — And Suraj Patel takes on Rep. Carolyn Maloney in NYC
Next StoryThe Immigration Policy Battle Gets Even Hotter | Iziah Thompson is Back with: This Week In Congress

SEARCH

CATEGORIES

  • Iziah Explains (4)
  • Just a Bill (7)
  • Opinion (24)
  • Reaching Across the Aisle (1)
  • Sponsored Content (4)
  • This Week in Congress (12)
  • Uncategorized (139)

ARCHIVES

  • September 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (5)
  • July 2018 (13)
  • June 2018 (22)
  • May 2018 (10)
  • April 2018 (11)
  • March 2018 (6)
  • February 2018 (3)
  • January 2018 (7)
  • December 2017 (6)
  • November 2017 (11)
  • October 2017 (5)
  • September 2017 (8)
  • August 2017 (9)
  • July 2017 (15)
  • June 2017 (9)
  • May 2017 (7)
  • April 2017 (10)
  • March 2017 (9)
  • February 2017 (8)
  • January 2017 (5)
  • December 2016 (4)
  • November 2016 (6)

TEXT

Sed molestie augue sit amet leo consequat posuere. Vestib ulum ante ipsum primis in fauc ibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae. Proin vel ante a orci tempus eleifend ut et mag. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, conse cetur adip.

LATEST POSTS

  • MAJOR 5G Danger Update — Environmental Health Trust & DailyClout Explain
    MAJOR 5G Danger Update — Environmental Health Trust & DailyClout Explain
  • mccain
    In Memory of Senator John McCain
  • more 5g
    Opinion: “Why Isn’t Our Government Protecting Us?” Environmental Health Trust Resources Alert On Health Risks of 5G Rollout
  • RapeKit
    Feminists for Life Say: “Rape Survivors’ Access to the Supportive Care Act (SASCA) is a Feminist Priority”
  • ar-15-e1494629975678
    Judge Says ‘No Way’ To Folks Printing Their Own 3-D Guns!

Copyright © 2018 DailyClout. All Rights Reserved

/* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Blog Post - start */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ h3.entry-title {font-size:40px !important; text-align:left; font-family:'Merriweather' !important; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:80px;} iframe {display:block; margin:auto;} .meta {font-family:'Merriweather'; margin:8px 0 20px 0;} .meta p {font-size:18px;} .author {border-top:1px solid #cecece; margin-top:40px; padding-top:20px; margin-bottom:40px; font-size:14px; line-height:20px;} .author img {border-radius:50%;} .twitter-tweet {margin:auto !important;} .fw-wp-embed-shortcode {margin-bottom:16px;} .blog-post img.aligncenter {width:100%;} /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Content Template: Blog Post - end */ /* ----------------------------------------- */